Production-ready frameworks for Playwright, Selenium, and Cypress. Page Object Model, fixtures, parallel execution, Allure reporting, and Azure DevOps + GitHub Actions CI/CD — wired together and ready to ship.
Complete test automation frameworks — not starter templates. Page Object Model, fixtures, parallel execution, Allure reports, and CI/CD all included. Six production-ready kits shipping now: Playwright Pro (TypeScript + C#), Cypress Pro, and Selenium Pro for Python, Java, and C#.
A production-ready Playwright test automation framework. Page object model, fixtures, data factories, parallel execution, and Azure DevOps CI/CD pipelines — all wired together and ready to ship in 30 minutes.
The same architecture in idiomatic C#. Microsoft.Playwright, NUnit, FluentAssertions, multi-user auth state reuse, Allure reports, Azure DevOps + GitHub Actions pipelines. .NET 8.
Production-ready Cypress framework in TypeScript. Custom commands, fixtures, network stubbing, component testing, and GitHub Actions CI/CD.
Selenium WebDriver in idiomatic C# with NUnit, FluentAssertions, parallel execution, and Azure DevOps pipelines. .NET 8.
Selenium 4 + Python with BasePage, POM, pytest-xdist parallel, custom waits, retry decorators, Faker factories, and Allure CI.
Selenium 4 + Java 17 with JUnit 5, REST Assured API testing, AssertJ, Java Faker, Surefire + Failsafe phases, Allure reporting.
The short answer: Playwright is the modern default, Cypress is the most focused browser-first TypeScript workflow, and Selenium is the broadest fit for established enterprise stacks.
| Choose | Best fit | Main strength | Available kits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playwright | New or modern cross-browser applications | Speed, isolation, multi-browser coverage | TypeScript and C# |
| Cypress | TypeScript teams focused on browser feedback | Readable debugging and component testing | TypeScript |
| Selenium | Existing enterprise suites and many languages | Maturity, ecosystem, language flexibility | C#, Python, and Java |
Choose Playwright for modern cross-browser web applications and fast parallel execution, Cypress for a browser-first TypeScript workflow with excellent component testing, and Selenium when you need broad language support, an established WebDriver ecosystem, or compatibility with an existing enterprise suite.
Playwright Pro — C# is the best fit for a .NET team starting a modern browser automation suite. Selenium Pro — C# is the better fit when the team already relies on Selenium WebDriver or needs to extend an established Selenium suite.
Yes. The kits include production-oriented pipeline examples, with Azure DevOps and GitHub Actions coverage varying by kit. They also include reporting, failure artifacts, and parallel execution patterns rather than only a local test command.
Yes. Each kit is structured as a maintainable foundation that can be adapted to an existing application. Teams can keep the fixture, page-object, data, reporting, and pipeline patterns while replacing the sample pages and test targets.
Need all six options? Compare the Complete Stack bundle. Want the background behind the kits? Read about the maker.
Every kit above — Playwright (TS + C#), Cypress, and Selenium (Python + Java + C#). Buy individually for $5,970, or get all six for $2,995. Save $2,975 (50% off).
Real CI runs. Every push to main runs the full test matrix on GitHub Actions — and we don’t hide the failures. Latest green run below.
Most Playwright boilerplates and QA automation kits leave you 60% of the way there. The starter template gives you a folder and a sample test — then you spend two weeks gluing together page objects, fixtures, CI pipelines, and reporting on top of it. The kit fills in the missing 40%.
These kits are distilled from two decades of QA leadership and SDET work — manual testing, automation lead, framework architect. Every directory, every fixture, every pipeline stage exists because of a real production test suite that needed it.
The docs and code structure are obsessive in a useful way — every choice is explained, every directory has a purpose, and every edge case has a note. If you’ve ever wished a framework just told you why, these kits are for you.
What's the most painful part of your test automation right now? What would you actually buy if it existed? I read every one of these personally and use them to decide which kits get built next.