// selenium test automation kits

Selenium Pro

A production-ready Selenium WebDriver framework with Page Object Model, parallel execution, Allure reporting, and CI/CD pipelines. Available in C#, Python, and Java — pick the language that matches your stack.

##Available editions

Same architecture and obsessive documentation, ported to each language. Pick the one that matches your stack.

selenium · csharp · nunit · azure-devops

Selenium Pro Automation KitC#

Selenium WebDriver in idiomatic C# with NUnit, FluentAssertions, parallel execution, and Azure DevOps pipelines. .NET 8.

selenium · python · pytest · github-actions

Selenium Pro Automation KitPython

Selenium 4 + Python with BasePage, POM, pytest-xdist parallel, custom waits, retry decorators, Faker factories, and Allure CI.

selenium · java · junit5 · maven · rest-assured

Selenium Pro Automation KitJava

Selenium 4 + Java 17 with JUnit 5, REST Assured API testing, AssertJ, Java Faker, Maven Surefire + Failsafe, and Allure reporting. 89 passing UI, API, database, and framework tests.

##Which automation framework is right for you?

The short answer: Playwright is the modern default, Cypress is the most focused browser-first TypeScript workflow, and Selenium is the broadest fit for established enterprise stacks.

Which test automation framework should I choose?

Choose Playwright for modern cross-browser web applications and fast parallel execution, Cypress for a browser-first TypeScript workflow with excellent component testing, and Selenium when you need broad language support, an established WebDriver ecosystem, or compatibility with an existing enterprise suite.

Which kit is best for a C# or .NET team?

Playwright Pro — C# is the best fit for a .NET team starting a modern browser automation suite. Selenium Pro — C# is the better fit when the team already relies on Selenium WebDriver or needs to extend an established Selenium suite.

Do the kits include CI/CD examples?

Yes. The kits include production-oriented pipeline examples, with Azure DevOps and GitHub Actions coverage varying by kit. They also include reporting, failure artifacts, and parallel execution patterns rather than only a local test command.

Are these kits suitable for an existing test suite?

Yes. Each kit is structured as a maintainable foundation that can be adapted to an existing application. Teams can keep the fixture, page-object, data, reporting, and pipeline patterns while replacing the sample pages and test targets.

Need all six options? Compare the Complete Stack bundle. Want the background behind the kits? Read about the maker.

##What every Selenium edition includes

The architecture is consistent across languages so you can switch between editions without relearning the framework.

  • Selenium WebDriver 4 with hands-off driver resolution
  • Page Object Model with strongly-typed page and component classes
  • Parallel test execution wired and ready out of the box
  • Fixtures + data factories for repeatable, isolated test data
  • Cookie + token injection helpers for fast logged-in tests
  • Allure reporting with screenshots and step annotations on failure
  • CI/CD pipeline included (Azure DevOps for C#, GitHub Actions for Python and Java)
  • SauceDemo + the-internet.herokuapp.com test targets included
  • Obsessive README — every package, helper, and CI step explained